I’ve been writing, rewriting, and rewriting this post for weeks. It deals with my perspectives on the gun control debate raging across America in the wake of the tragic events in Newtown, Conn.
There have been many voices on this subject over the past few weeks. And one of my favorite writers, Charles Krauthammer, synthesized much of what I planned to write in an article that appeared in Sunday’s Des Moines Register. And of course, Mr. Krauthammer’s article was much better than any of my previous drafts. There’s a reason he’s a nationally syndicated writer, and I’m not.
My premise in this debate is rather simple: We need to focus not only on Second Amendment rights. We also need to focus on free speech rights of the First Amendment; due process rights of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments; and equal protection rights of the 14th Amendment. The ultimate solution, if people are serious about finding one, will involve concessions from all corners of the Constitution and from all interested.
As Mr. Krauthammer stated,
That’s a lot of impingement, a lot of amendments. But there’s no free lunch. Increasing public safety almost always means restricting liberties.
We made that trade after 9/11. We make it every time the Transportation Security Administration invades your body at an airport. How much are we prepared to trade away after Newtown?
Those who are serious about getting to the bottom of this issue will speak clearly to that point. They will take the time to discuss infringement of all rights before focusing on the infringement of any rights.
Those who are only interested in demagoguery will only address selected rights.
We will know immediately that they are not serious about solving this problem or protecting public safety. They will be interested only in scoring cheap political points. On this subject, we’ve had far too much of that already.