Tag Archives: reputation

The NFL’s Steroid Moment

Baseball had steroids.

In 1990, rumors started swirling that players were “juiced,” using steroids, synthetic steroid derivatives, and human growth hormone (HGH).  The result: greatly increased muscle mass, resulting in quicker reaction time and stronger swings for hitters. It also reduced injuries among players, which decreased the chances players from AAA farm teams would be called up to the Big Leagues. In short, it substantially perverted the game and blew the mainstay of professional baseball – historical statistics…out of the water.

By 2000, the rumors were significant enough to have MLB ban steroids and their synthetic derivatives. In 2004, MLB began testing players, and between 5-7% failed their drug tests. The results were kept secret, and the hush surrounding the presence of juiced players made the intensity of the investigations more acute. By 2006, rumors had become reality, with the leaks of various investigations and Jose Canseco’s tell-all book . Dozens of high-profile players were now publicly suspected of being juiced, and the stain of the steroid era led MLB Commissioner Selig to appoint former Senator George Mitchell to lead a wide-ranging investigation.

In 2007, the Mitchell Report was issued (having leaked all over the internet in December of 2006), and it blew the lid off the presence of performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs) in professional baseball. With the issuance of the report and the various investigations thereafter, 129 professional baseball players have been implicated, admitted use, or been suspended for using various banned substances.

It took MLB almost a decade to deal with the steroid stain, and it did so only after public outcry and a direct threat to its financial powerhouse status. The statistics of baseball (ERA, home runs, OBP, RISP) have settled down and regained consistency. Fan interest is strong, and once again, fathers like me can point their sons to players who truly serve as role models.

The NFL has concussions and suicides.

The NFL has its own issues with PEDs. Within the player ranks, the term “NFL” is laughed off as an acronym for “Narcotics For Life.” That being said,  the NFL has one of the strictest policies relating to PEDs in professional sports and it has been brutal in its enforcement.

But the NFL was rocked again last week by the suicide of a well-regarded former player, Junior Seau. His suicide, the 12th in the last 25 years, and the second within a span of two weeks, is bringing searing attention to the long-standing issue of concussions in professional football.

The NFL should be very concerned about the convergence of several data points. First, the long-standing idea that a player should “play through the fog” or “play hurt”. Second, issues like the New Orleans Saints “bounty” program. Third, the causes of an increase in the rate of concussions and the long-term effect of those injuries. And most alarming, the spate of former player suicides.

To an average football fan, there is a link between football players being paid bounties to be even more violent and intentionally cause injuries…being coached to play hurt…and the long-term effects on those players after they leave the game. This link becomes even clearer when some of those former players commit suicide in ways that preserve their brains for post-autopsy scientific study.

Reaching the pinnacle of a professional sport, especially football, is an amazing accomplishment for an athlete. It’s the result of thousands of hours of practice and countless sacrifices. For that accomplishment, they are paid handsomely and revered by millions. When they leave the game, they are quickly forgotten and moved aside for the next superstar.

We treat our returning soldiers for the long-term effects of combat. We help them make the transition back to civilian life, far from the dangers of the battlefield. The NFL should do no less for its warriors. Once off the main stage of Sunday afternoon, it should help former players adjust back to a more normal lifestyle.

There can be no louder clarion call than that of a former player who has lived with the long-term effects of repeatedly smashing his helmeted brain into an opponent’s helmeted brain. When that player succumbs to the effects of his long-masked injury, and preserves his brain to be studied, the NFL ought to stop looking the other way and stop making excuses. It should stop dead in its tracks on proposing an even longer season for its players.

MLB could have learned a lesson or two from the NFL in how to control substance abuse. Let’s hope the NFL learns a lesson from MLB…and doesn’t take a decade or more to clean up its proverbial locker room.


Leave a comment

Filed under Reputation Management

America’s Second Half

“This country can’t be knocked out with one punch. We get right back up again and when we do, the world’s gonna hear the roar of our engines. Yeah, it’s halftime, America. And our second half is about to begin.”

Clint Eastwood, “Halftime in America”

Those words, uttered by an American icon, cut through the hoopla of the Super Bowl last Sunday. More importantly, they cut right through the political chatter of an election year. The impact of this one advertisement cannot be understated.

An estimated audience of 110 million watched Sunday’s Super Bowl. An additional 4 million viewers have watched the two minute advertisement since Sunday. Immediately, the message was praised from the Left and panned from the Right. The Obama Administration claimed it was vindication for the auto bailout program, which started under President Bush and concluded under President Obama’s watch. The right challenged the ad, focusing on the fact that it was “not even shot in Detroit” and had too heavy of a political message.

Both are missing the point.

I watched the ad on Sunday as it came on in spectacular high definition. Within seconds, I recognized the voice, and the unmistakable gait of Clint Eastwood. I was mesmerized by the visuals, the lack of polluting screen graphics, the use of black and white, color and soft focus, and the solemnity of the subjects. But what really captured me was the message.

I hung on every word. When Eastwood appeared on screen at the close, I knew it would be powerful. He didn’t disappoint.

What Eastwood did in two minutes was to reset years of divisive political discourse in this country. He didn’t endorse the bailout of the auto industry. In fact, he’s on record as having opposed it. He didn’t lay blame for America’s problems with any one political party; he rose above it.

He cut right through the blather, and hit the very emotional nerve of what makes America so unique: we are, in our core, an optimistic people. We face challenges, large and small, with determination and grit. When we’re kicked down in the dirt, we get back up. We pull together, get the job done and then move on. We face our challenges and achieve our goals because we have the optimism to know it’s possible. And we know it’s possible, because we’ve done it for the last 236 years.

Clint Eastwood may not ever earn an award for his two minute commercial during the Super Bowl, but in my humble opinion, he should. He is a man who has a unique grasp of what makes America so unique. He had the courage to step up and say it in his own words, and to deliver them as only he could.

I’m not concerned that Clint Eastwood will be rattled by the debate raging around his commercial. In fact, I’d predict, he’d tell critics to “go ahead, make my day.”

In Sunday’s two minutes, and the two days since, he has spoken directly to hundreds of millions of Americans. More importantly, he has spoken directly to the unique emotion that moves us as Americans.

I’d say he’s made our day.

Leave a comment

Filed under Paid Media

When Protecting Your Reputation, Speed Kills

The below article originally appeared in the Des Moines Business Record.

It’s no longer a 24-hour news cycle. Fueled by an insatiable appetite for scandal and by new media more than capable of satisfying the hunger, today’s news is minute-to-minute.

This creates a false sense of security for those public figures and brands facing down bad PR. It’s never been more tempting to adopt an “ignore it and it’ll blow over” philosophy.

But, as evidenced by three recent cases, that is a dangerous mentality. In 2011, Herman Cain, Rick Perry and Justin Bieber each learned that nothing slows the news cycle faster than a scandal. Taken together, their cases provide the perfect continuum of how to and how not to react in a media crisis.

Taking a direct shot to his wholesome image, 17-year-old pop star Bieber was at once named the father of an unborn baby and the defendant in a paternity lawsuit.

Immediately, Bieber’s team put him in front of the cameras. Comfortable in the limelight, he not only denied paternity and the alleged circumstances surrounding the baby’s conception with poise, he also explained why the accusations were impossible.

Bieber was the only one doing the talking. There were no spokespeople or lawyers. And, he took the moral high-road, never disparaging the pregnant accuser.

The result? Bieber’s wholesome reputation remained intact and he closed out 2011 as the first solo artist to have three No. 1 albums before the age of 18.

On the opposite end of the continuum we find Herman Cain. Even with ample warning of the accusations about to plague his presidential campaign, Cain’s team did not develop a plan. There was no strategy for how to mitigate the reputational damage posed to him by several sexual harassment accusers – and it showed as the accusations floated in the media for days, unanswered by Cain.

What Cain lacked in preparedness he made up for in spokespeople. When he wasn’t talking – and sometimes even when he was – his lawyer, his campaign manager or his wife was also going on the record. This may have been acceptable if the team was consistent. They were not.

Cain also attacked his accusers. Doing so made Cain the all-too-familiar villain in another classic “blame the victim” storyline.

The result? A suspended bid for the White House and a reputation damaged, most likely beyond restoration.

Rick Perry falls somewhere in the middle of our continuum. After a debate gaffe made him the most watched YouTube video for two days running, the presidential candidate faced a tidal wave of embarrassment. Like Cain, Perry was without a plan, mainly because no one expected this kind public misstep from a practiced and competent candidate.

Unlike Cain, however, Perry sprang into action immediately. He changed course on his campaign trail to sit down with as many major media as would have him. In a situation like his, Perry knew, speed kills.

More important than Perry’s quickness was the spirit of his message. With self-deprecation and humor, he admitted his mistake and reassured voters that he understood the problems of the country and as his proposals for fixing them.

Like Bieber, Perry did his own talking. There was no campaign manager making excuses for him or attempting to retell the story.

The result?  A candidate who bought critical time to rehabilitate himself in the successive debates.

Each of these cases proves that when your integrity is questioned, you have to react immediately. It doesn’t matter if you’re a teen heartthrob, a Governor, a pizza magnate, or a corporate brand. You need to quickly assess the facts and be consistent in your messaging. And most importantly, you need to be as aggressive, if not more, than the media outlets who will spin this story with or without your input.

Leave a comment

Filed under Reputation Management